الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract bar l e y which caused by He Im ~r~f.hnspoiurm- g r a m 117et~rna t F a c u l t y of Agricult,ure, Kafr F1-Shai klr governorate, TZ3nt.a Universit. y . The fo1 lowing repr.esor\t.s the r-esu 1 t,s of these s t u d i e s : 1 . 7 t~e f ungn 1 i so 1 ;lt.es f ~-nm p l nrlt; samples, which had the s t.r- i pe d t sense syn1pt.c-ws, proved n 1 ways t h a t t,he fungus 3. Eia1 c!at.ion of t.he most lmpor-t,ant 1 ocal cul ti vars of barley ngnir>st. the st.r- ipe dl sease proved that cul tivar Gi7n 131 wn.c, ti most. I-e.zist.firl1; orla, and the most SlJSCept,i b l e cult. i v a r f o r the disease was Cc89. 3. There were s i g n i f i c a n t , decreases i n p l a n t h e i g h t and in the 1000-kernel weight. as a r e s u l t of the s t r i p e disease infect.ion, t-,he most decrease i n p l a n t h e i g h t was in CcR9 whi le !;tie least. decrease i n p l a n t h e i g h t was i n Giza 173. Hegnrdirly, the 1000-kernel weight, the cultivar Gi7n 134 wris t.he >- ost, affected f o l l owe d b y >cci1t.ivar Gi7a 133, while cultivar- Giza 121 was the least, affected one. 4 . The fungal mediiim which gave the highest. rate of the f~jngal growt.h at, t.he f it-st. week of growing r e s u l t e d in t,I~cj lowest. r-at.e of the fungal growth at, the t h i r d and fo~rrt.t~we nk ( i . e. , pot.nt,o-dex tlrose ”PD” ) , whi 1e t h e flrrlgal rnet-litlrn wt~ic.t~ga ve the lowes t rnte o f the fcingal gr r-)wt.h at. t.he t.hree weeks r-es1~t.1ed i n the h i g h e s t |