Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Ultrasonography and serum estradiol / progesterone ratio as predictors of pregnancy rate after ICSI/ET cycles /
الناشر
Nada Hossam Aldin Ahmed Mohamed ,
المؤلف
Nada Hossam Aldin Ahmed Mohamed
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Nada Hossam Aldin Ahmed Mohamed
مشرف / Ayman Abdalhalim Marzouk
مشرف / Dalia Samir Thu Alfakkar
مشرف / Hisham Mamdouh Haggag
مشرف / Abeer Mohamed Mohy Aldin
تاريخ النشر
2019
عدد الصفحات
120 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
أمراض النساء والتوليد
تاريخ الإجازة
21/10/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - كلية الطب - Obstetrics and Gynecology
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 145

from 145

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether or not endometrial thickness, echogenic pattern and E2/P ratio measured on the day of embryo transfer can serve as reliable predictors of treatment outcome following ICST/ET cycles. Methods: A total of 367 infertile women undergoing embryo transfer after ICSI cycles were studied in a prospective study. Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration and on the day of ET and of endometrial echo-pattern, E2/P ratio on the day of embryo transfer, hormonal profile (Day 3 FSH, LH and E2), and various other variables (age, BMI, number of oocytes retrieved per patient, fertilization rate, number and quality of embryos) were evaluated. These variables were compared among the clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy and non-pregnant groups. Also, their influence on implantation rate was examined. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the measured endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration (10.67±2.25, 10.59±2.18, 10.56±2.22, p=0.5) and that measured on the day of embryo transfer among the three groups. The distribution of patients with type A endometrium among the clinical pregnancy Vs the chemical pregnancy group (p=0.9) and that among the clinical pregnancy group Vs the non-pregnant group (p=0.14) was statistically insignificant. The E2/P ratio was calculated and compared among the three groups, however the difference was statistically insignificant (78.08±85.27, 51.86±44.81, 110.57±274.49, p=0.65)