Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Evaluation of the esthetic outcome of lithium disilicate (E.max) all ceramic crowns on titanium implant abutments in the esthetic zone after different color masking approaches :
الناشر
Karim Ahmed Awadallah Osman ,
المؤلف
Karim Ahmed Awadallah Osman
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Karim Ahmed Awadallah Osman
مشرف / Mohamed Labib Zamzam
مشرف / Reham Said Elbasty
مناقش / Mohamed Labib Zamzam
الموضوع
Esthetics
تاريخ النشر
2020
عدد الصفحات
147 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
تاريخ الإجازة
14/2/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - الفم والأسنان - Prosthodontics
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 163

from 163

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate of the esthetic outcome of lithium disilicate (e.max) all ceramic crowns on titanium implant abutments in the esthetic zone after different color masking approaches. Methodology:A total of twenty-seven patients (18 females, 9 males) were selected for the study with an age range between 20 to 62 years old. Each participant received an implant and lithium disilicate (E-max)single crowns over titanium abutments in the esthetic zone.The patients were divided into three groups according to the masking method of the titanium abutments: group A(control group) patients receivedE-max crowns over uncovered titanium abutments (N=9),group B patients received E-max crowns over titanium abutments covered by a layer of opaque porcelain (N=9), group C patients received E-max crowns over titanium abutments covered by lithium disilicate (high opacity) coping (N=9). Pink and white esthetics were measured by PES/WES score by Belser et al 2009, while the color measurements were performed using a digital Spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V) and CIE L* a* b* color coordinates. Results:Regarding PES, there was no statistically significant difference among the three groupswith P-value = 0.888(with means 7.9,8 &7.9 for groups I, II &III respectively,). For WES, there was a significant difference, with groups II&III having higher mean (8.4) than group I (7) with P-value = 0.001. For xE values, there was a significant difference among the three groups (P-value <0.001) where group I showed the highest mean (6.36) while group III showed the lowest (3.71)