Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Nephrometry Scoring System selects Candidates for Radical Nephrectomy versus Nephron Sparing Surgery for Treatment of Renal Masses and Predicts Surgical and Oncological Outcome/
المؤلف
Mohamed, Hossam Abdelsamie Abdelmonem.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Hossam Abdelsamie Abdelmonem Mohamed
مشرف / Magdy Fathallah Mansour
مشرف / Ahmed Mohamed Saafan
مشرف / Mohamed Kotb Ahmed Tolba
تاريخ النشر
2020.
عدد الصفحات
63 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
جراحة المسالك البولية
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - المسالك
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 63

from 63

Abstract

The kidney is a precious organ which deserves special care when dealing with it.
Kidney is an organ which is not far away or apart from tumors as the case in the other body organs, making it interesting to study more and more to update the ways of treatment of those tumors.
Since 2009, when Kutikov and Uzzo had begun to think about standardization the issue of how to make a proper decision to deal with solid renal tumors and not to leave it to surrender to the surgeon’s experiences, when they had settled down RENAL scoring system and till this time many surgeons were being busy trying to standardize the same issue.
Being an important issue, our study, hand to hand with the previous studies tried to work hardly to prove, improve and update RENAL nephrometry scoring system, which will help to treat more patients of renal tumors with the right way they deserve to have and to standardize the proper decision of treatment among surgeons all over the world.
After months of hard work, during which combined prospective and retrospective studies were applied on eighty five of the patients with 87 solid/ cystic renal tumors who had fulfilled the inclusion criteria previously mentioned in the protocol, and after comparing our results with the previous studies’ results many issues were concluded.
Patients with solid/cystic renal masses who had low nephrometry scores are more likely to be treated with nephron sparing surgeries and those with high complexity scores are more likely to be treated with radical surgeries.
Paradoxically, almost all patients who were included in our study and underwent open nephron sparing surgeries lost more blood during and after the surgeries than those who underwent open radical surgeries. So most probably it’s the era of minimally invasive interventions.
More studies on larger sample sizes are required to agree with or refuse our conclusions.
Finally, our study has used RENAL scoring system to subdivide patients with solid/cystic renal tumors according to them scores into low, moderate and high complexity groups.
We used this system also to settle down and standardize the type of treatment of those patient whether by using nephron sparing or radical surgeries, and the way of intervention whether by using open or minimally invasive options i.e. Laparoscope or robot assisted interventions.
Our study predicted the complications by using this scoring system as well.