الفهرس | يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام |
المستخلص The aim of the study: Principle aim of this study is to investigate the effects of electricity pricing on the economic, social and political situations. Study methodology: Data obtained through the survey list conducted were based on a sample of consumers at The North Delta Electricity Distribution Company, and the sample size was (384) single, and a range of statistical methods were used such as descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, simple regression method, Man Whitney test, and Crosscal Walice test. Results: This study found a moral relationship between electricity pricing and economic, social and political effects, and a moral impact between electricity pricing and economic, social and political effects. And according to the opinion of the individual samples, there is an absence of moral differences on the variables of the study except the demographic variables (Social status - average income - place of residence) hypothesis hypothesis Method of statistical analysis. result 2/1 There is no intangible effect of electricity pricing on the economic situation Simple linear regression analysis Refused 2/2 There is no intangible effect of electricity pricing on social impacts Simple linear regression analysis Refused 2/3 There is no intangible effect of electricity pricing on the political situation Simple linear regression analysis Refused 3/1 There are no statistically significant differences about the economic, social and political implications of electricity pricing according to the difference of place of residence (countryside -city). Mann–Whitney U test Accepted 3/2 There are no statistically significant differences about the economic, social and political implications of electricity pricing according to the different social situation (single-married). Mann–Whitney U test Accepted 3/3 There are no statistically significant differences about the economic, social and political implications of electricity pricing according to the difference of average monthly income (less than 3000, from 3000 to less than 5000, more than 5000) pounds Kruskal–Wallis Accepted. |