الفهرس | يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام |
المستخلص Goal & importance The current study aimed to form a real structure for social & economic factors that may play an important role in disease, in order to use this knowledge as a social dimension for treatment & asserting the importance the importance of social aspects in treatment. The importance of this study is a following:- - putting the socioeconomic factors in priority when treating diseases, due to its important influence in the success or failure of the treatment plan. - Demonstrating the contributions of sociology and its convenience for researching diseases, prophylaxis & management, using the issues of medical sociology to study the disease as a social status and using hypothesis to provide different explanations. - Applying medical sociology data in the regard of socioeconomic factors role in disease, as an attempt to develop this framework through the comprehensive understanding of these factors. - Measuring individual perception to the role played by socioeconomic factors in disease. Study problems & hypothesis that the study endeavored to verify. The study problem was studying the social factors (Ecology, sociology & physical ecology) and the economic factors (social class) regarding disease. The main hypothesis - there is a statistically significant relation (0.05) between socioeconomic factors & disease. The first branch hypothesis: there is a statistically significant relation (0.05) between the social, factors (social ecology, physical ecology) and disease. The second branch hypothesis: there is a statistically significant relation (0.05) between the economic factors (social class) and disease. Study scopes: A – The place reach: 1- Patients place – Tripoli medical center. 2- Healthy people place – various and different places in Tripoli. B- individuals reach: 1- A group of male & female patients in the admission wards in Tripoli Medical center. 2- A group of healthy people form different places in Tripoli. C- Time frame: - Starting as from registration date 02-10-2012 until preparing the final form of the thesis on February 2015. Study tools: Questionnaire forms to monitor the index of socioeconomic factors. Study results: 1. there is statistically significant effect for the socioeconomic factors on disease (0.05), and that means the patient are surrounded by negative socioeconomic factors than the healthy people. 2. there is a statistically significant effect for the social factors on disease (0.05), and that means the patient are surrounded by negative social factors more than the healthy people. a- there is a statistically significant effect for the social ecology (social habits – family relations) on disease (0.05)/ b- there is a statistically significant effect for the materialistic ecology (neighborhood- residence) on disease (0.05). 3. there is a statistically significant effect for the economic factors (social class) on disease (0.05). 4. Meaning the there is a statistically significant effect for social class (income – Education – profession) on disease (0.05). |