Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Systematic Review of Literature on the use of Radial Head Prosthesis Versus Fixation in Fracture Head of Radius in Young Adults/
المؤلف
Soliman,Islam Mohamed Mohamed
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / اسلام محمد محمد سليمان
مشرف / محمد سامي الدكتور / طارق الأستاذ
مشرف / الدكتور / عمرو أحمد عبد الرحمن
تاريخ النشر
2016.
عدد الصفحات
64.p;
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
1/9/2016
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - كلية الطب - Orthopaedic Surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 64

from 64

Abstract

Although several treatment options for radial head fractures are available, no clear solutions exist.
In this study we therefore compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with radial head prosthesis replacement in treatment of radial head fractures of Mason type III.
The mean age of patients mentioned in the studies was 46.4 years old. Mean age of ORIF group of patients was 50.4 years old, while the mean age of radial head replacement group of patients was 42.5 years old. 232 patients underwent ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation) and 287 underwent radial head replacement. 342 males and 177 females. Mean follow up period was 32.3 months (2.89 years).
We concluded that ORIF has no superiority over radial head replacement and vice versa, and still a lot of controversies between two methods of management for fracture head of radius (Mason type 3).