Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Epidemiological Study of Patients on Regular Haemodialysis at Kafer El- Shekh Governorate-Egypt /
المؤلف
Elbazaway, Mohammed Mohammed Abd El- Tawab.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / محمد محمد عبد التواب البزاوي
مشرف / حسن عبد الهادي احمد
مشرف / ياسين صلاح ياسين
مناقش / أحمد راغب توفيق
الموضوع
Hemodialysis. Arterial catheterization. Arteriovenous shunts, Surgical
تاريخ النشر
2014 .
عدد الصفحات
169 .p :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
الطب الباطني
تاريخ الإجازة
14/10/2014
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنوفية - كلية الطب - قسم الباطنة العامة
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 169

from 169

Abstract

(ESRD) is one of the main health problems in Egypt. Currently, hemodialysis represents the main mode for treatment of chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5), previously called ESRD or chronic renal failure.
Although hemodialysis is often used for treatment of ESRD, no practice guidelines are available in Egypt. Healthcare facilities are seeking nowadays to develop practice guidelines for the sake of improving healthcare services. In the healthcare sector in Egypt, trials for establishing guidelines have been lead by the MOH.
This work is a part of project aiming at statement of the current status of dialysis patient in Egypt using a questionnaire. This project is modulated by Nephrology department, Menoufiya University.This study was done in period from November 2012 to May 2013.
Our study sample consisted of 735 clinically stable chronic patients on regular thrice- weekly HD. Patients were collected from KAFER ELSHAKH governorate-Egypthaemodialysis centers.
In all patients we recorded full history and clinical examination stressing on etiology of renal disease and associated complications, Full review of all medical records over the last 6 months, and details of HD prescription (Doctors, nurses, and administration orders).
Results of this study demonstrated that there were many causes for ESRD in the study population, where HTN 34%, DM 14%, and in 25.3% the cause was unknown. Differentco morbidities in the study population were HTN in (56.7%), DM in (26.8%).
The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± The mean value of HD period was 4.35 (± 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value 4.43) years. The mean value of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of patients dry weight was 73.07 (± 15.95) Kg.of.